Being Able to Practice the Invention is not the Same as Being Able to Practice the Full Scope of the Invention

In Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc., [2020-2155, 2020-2156] (May 11, 2021), the Federal Circuit affirmed the jury determination that U.S. Patent Nos. 9,546,400 and 9,772,323 were invalid under 35 U.S.C. ยง 112 for lack of … Continue reading Being Able to Practice the Invention is not the Same as Being Able to Practice the Full Scope of the Invention